Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac12,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac12,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-942B59F58194171B
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '24 at 17:53
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500S
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 79.4
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 125
56% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 188
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700M
Apple(106B 6740) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 6.9
6% 6.97 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 6.3
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 85 73 74 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 390
Write 262
Mixed 284
SusWrite 95
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 22.1
83% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 190
165% 245 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 6% 36 116 23 67 28.9" 1280 720 APPA007 iMac
Typical iMac12,2 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac12,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback