Asrock A320M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M/ac  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJun 03 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 247
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 692
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.85
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (58 fps cap detected)
47.3% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 58
Parallax 58
47% 58 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 58
Splatting 58
48% 58 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 413 419 426 366 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 422
Mixed 382
SusWrite 356
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 44.7
153% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 249
192% 261 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Sandisk Plus 1TB A3N
684GB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2098 2079 2054 945 128 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 1,860
Write 2,158
Mixed 1,850
SusWrite 1,234
400% 1,775 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 75.9
261% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 791
597% 807 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 267%
Great: 344%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G266681 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 30.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B5 SAMSUNG
Typical A320M/ac Builds (Compare 1,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback