Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 228%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 291%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive472% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '24 at 20:26
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$475
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 222
2-Core 436
126% 246 Pts
4-Core 847
8-Core 1,543
143% 1,195 Pts
64-Core 3,657
226% 3,657 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 279
Reflection 260
Parallax 272
228% 270 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 242
Splatting 189
205% 260 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 196%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3944 3935 3934 3932 3931 3996 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
472% Outstanding
Read 1,932
Write 3,612
Mixed 3,107
SusWrite 3,945
719% 3,149 MB/s
4K Read 65.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 88.4
287% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,712
DQ Write 1,196
DQ Mixed 1,501
1,108% 1,469 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 472%
Great: 587%
WD Blue SN580 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1268 1264 1259 1263 1260 1260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,292
Write 1278
Mixed 1,181
SusWrite 1,262
283% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 66.4
234% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,540
DQ Write 1,471
DQ Mixed 1,833
1,286% 1,615 MB/s
Poor: 243%
This bench: 268%
Great: 594%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
332GB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3480 2901 1211 1181 1197 1202 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,628
Write 2,978
Mixed 2,884
SusWrite 1,862
584% 2,588 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 87.5
282% 96.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,765
DQ Write 1,360
DQ Mixed 1,545
1,160% 1,556 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 376%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6000 C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
348% Outstanding
MC Read 280
MC Write 62.2
MC Mixed 78
400% 140 GB/s
SC Read 49.2
SC Write 74.5
SC Mixed 58
173% 60.6 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 348%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 34" 3440 1377 MSI3DB6 MSI MAG342CQR
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,096
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback