Asrock H370 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H370 Performance  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '24 at 18:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$285
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 90.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 926
87% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 101
Parallax 90.3
79% 95.9 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 89.9
Splatting 77.2
71% 88.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
531GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 74 67 73 72 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 473
Write 81
Mixed 124
SusWrite 72.6
40% 188 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 23.3
101% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 110
86% 121 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G30C15U4B.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 28.3
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 26.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM7715 LG HDR WFHD
Typical H370 Performance Builds (Compare 348 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock H370 Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback