Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N6506MJ
Memory12.6 GB free of 24 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '24 at 04:10
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 50.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 373
99% 200 Pts
4-Core 761
8-Core 1,306
125% 1,034 Pts
64-Core 2,151
133% 2,151 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Asus(1043 3698) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5008
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 52.3
24% 32.6 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 42.1
27% 31.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00-1102 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,721
Write 1,459
Mixed 1,906
448% 2,029 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 57.6
188% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 334
237% 308 MB/s
Poor: 219% Great: 358%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 329
Write 377
Mixed 352
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 27.9
90% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 31.9
55% 106 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5CG46AGBDX HMCG78AGBSA095N 24GB
5600, 5600 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 37.5
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 25.7
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 108%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 44 60 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4161
Typical ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus ASUS Vivobook Pro 15 N6506MJ_Q543MJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback