Asus Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '24 at 23:39
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$250
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 172
2-Core 335
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,075
101% 839 Pts
64-Core 1,608
100% 1,608 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$490
PNY(196E 138A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 195
Parallax 187
166% 195 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 140
Splatting 124
120% 150 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 140%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 1868 2063 1897 1890 1878 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 2,987
Mixed 2,777
SusWrite 1,803
573% 2,538 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 93.1
303% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 105
86% 120 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 314%
Great: 477%
WDC WD20EZBX-75AYRA0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 12091512
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 207 206 207 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 223
Write 199
Mixed 136
SusWrite 206
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 1.4
67% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 46%
Kxg70pnv2t04 NVMe KIOXIA 2048GB
2TB free
Firmware: 10904105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2288 2258 1777 1767 1762 1774 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,075
Write 2,307
Mixed 2,000
SusWrite 1,938
470% 2,080 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 61.2
201% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 48.6
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 64.9
54% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 268%
Great: 423%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
197GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 124 119 117 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 118
Write 118
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 122
69% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
7TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 181 182 180 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 149
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 180
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
242% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 35.3
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 28.9
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 27" 1280 720 SPT0AB9 Sceptre Y27
Typical Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION Builds (Compare 1,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Z590 WIFI GUNDAM EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $885
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback