Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210910
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '24 at 21:11
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$144
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 172
2-Core 318
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 967
95% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,173
73% 1,173 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 119
Parallax 160
138% 149 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
116% 147 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 500GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DHHR4116
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 379 384 372 375 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 293
Write 380
Mixed 303
SusWrite 363
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 29.9
114% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 146
124% 175 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
80% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 32" 1280 720 XMD00E1 Mi TV
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 3,705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $955
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback