PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190813 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | May 29 '24 at 11:47 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Pentium Gold G5500-$36
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
72.2%
Very good
|
80% 137 Pts
|
42% 312 Pts
|
19% 312 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.7%
Average
|
44% 52.4 fps
|
37% 45.6 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown R744G2606U1S 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
79.2%
Very good
|
80% 28 GB/s
|
69% 24.3 GB/s
|
61% 65.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 55 | 26 | 60 | 24.5" | 1858 1057 | IVM6131 PL2530H |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $119Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,239x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 711x |
Core i3-8100Intel $148Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 220x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $152Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 317x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 216x |
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 214x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $365 |