Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-cp0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 17-cp0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88C6
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '24 at 17:37
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 41.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 265
75% 148 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 742
76% 613 Pts
64-Core 979
61% 979 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 88C6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 22.9
14% 19.4 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 21.9
Splatting 15
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00BH1 1TB
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 302 232 290 107 248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,077
Write 340
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 220
94% 433 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 37.6
112% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 599
460% 635 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 263%
Samsung 990 Evo M.2 1TB-$80
846GB free
Firmware: 0B2QKXJ7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 576 585 602 589 604 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 771
Write 607
Mixed 623
SusWrite 589
145% 648 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 52.4
156% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 714
522% 683 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 146%
Great: 393%
Verbatim Vi550 S3 512GB
29GB free
Firmware: H221215a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 394 405 354 177 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 411
Write 429
Mixed 392
SusWrite 305
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 29.6
102% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 197
142% 179 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-113.A01G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 120 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0B88 XF240Y S3
Typical Laptop 17-cp0xxx Builds (Compare 510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cp0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback