Asus X580VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X580VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X580VD
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateMay 27 '24 at 17:07
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 190
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 484
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1A10) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5585
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 27.2
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 25.3
22% 28.4 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 19.8
22% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 22 19 19 19 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 70%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
288GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 72 72 70 70 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 77.8
Write 55.4
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 70.3
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6J1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 44% 16 169 8 60 15.5" 1536 801 CMN15D5
Typical X580VD Builds (Compare 1,193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X580VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback