Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC12WSBi7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC12WSHi7
MotherboardIntel NUC12WSBi7  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 24 '24 at 00:59
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 104
2-Core 169
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 406
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 3024) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3729
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 18
12% 17.9 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 14.1
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$99
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,757
Write 4,050
Mixed 3,147
747% 3,318 MB/s
4K Read 68.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 94.2
304% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 770
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 629
452% 591 MB/s
Poor: 275% Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD32D4S2S8MF-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 32.6
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 20.8
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 11% 28 112 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 PHLC249 PHL 329M1RV
Typical NUC12WSBi7 Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel NUC12WSBi7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback