MSI MS-17K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Raider GE76 12UE
MotherboardMSI MS-17K4  (all builds)
Memory53.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 08:09
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 200
2-Core 376
113% 218 Pts
4-Core 708
8-Core 1,285
120% 997 Pts
64-Core 2,142
132% 2,142 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 1324) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 30
22% 29.5 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 0.1
10% 14 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK1N.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 703 307 268 259 112 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 573
Mixed 162
SusWrite 325
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 276
4K Mixed 88.6
283% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,457
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 1,239
916% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 178%
Great: 394%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
405GB free
Firmware: ELFK1N.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 750 252 258 117 224 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,318
Write 2,912
Mixed 2,172
SusWrite 542
394% 1736 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 286
4K Mixed 89.6
342% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,559
DQ Write 1,009
DQ Mixed 1,317
973% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 248%
Great: 394%
SABRENT DISK00 1TB
33GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 102
Write 103
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 0.7
74% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 209%
SABRENT DISK01 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 105 106 104 105 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 102
Write 73.8
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 103
111% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 212%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB
695GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 106 104 105 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 99.9
Write 101
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 104
116% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK03 2TB
250GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 58.6
Write 93.6
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 0
82% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
152% Outstanding
MC Read 60.1
MC Write 59.9
MC Mixed 57.9
169% 59.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 28
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 152%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 144 17.3" 1920 1009 AUO978F
Typical MS-17K4 Builds (Compare 1,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback