Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10AAS0060A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10AAS0060A  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 04:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1820T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 53
1-Core 61
2-Core 106
44% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 112
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 30A3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.48% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.9
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.48%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 219 292 304 324 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 428
Write 345
Mixed 297
SusWrite 287
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 29.5
101% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 215
175% 250 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 4
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 8 60 22.5" 1280 720 BNQEB78 BenQ GW2381
Typical 10AAS0060A Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AAS0060A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback