Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 04:58
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$248
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 12.5
2-Core 169
52% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 1,072
92% 786 Pts
64-Core 2,037
126% 2,037 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 251
Parallax 537
199% 344 fps
MRender 420
Gravity 212
Splatting 337
264% 323 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 197%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,242
Write 1,096
Mixed 1,043
251% 1,127 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 21.1
71% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 589
448% 606 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
178GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 393
Write 330
Mixed 326
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 16.5
55% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 143
129% 197 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 43
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 40
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 16% 25 174 8 60 27" 2560 1369 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback