Framework Laptop 16 (AMD Ryzen 7040 Series)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFramework Laptop 16 (AMD Ryzen 7040 Series)  (all builds)
MotherboardFramework FRANMZCP09
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '24 at 01:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 67.7
1-Core 200
2-Core 391
112% 219 Pts
4-Core 774
8-Core 1,248
124% 1,011 Pts
64-Core 1,487
92% 1,487 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Device(F111 0005) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.40.18.02
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.8% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 56.2
34% 36 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 75.5
42% 46.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 1346 1335 2579 2582 2618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 1659
Write 2,585
Mixed 2,031
SusWrite 1,942
466% 2,054 MB/s
4K Read 63.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 81.6
266% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 443
DQ Mixed 949
660% 842 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 303%
Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40S5.M4A1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 165 16" 2560 1600 BOE0BC9
Typical Laptop 16 (AMD Ryzen 7040 Series) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Framework Laptop 16 (AMD Ryzen 7040 Series)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback