Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '24 at 22:07
Run Duration78 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900-$376
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 203
2-Core 386
116% 223 Pts
4-Core 722
8-Core 1,455
128% 1,088 Pts
64-Core 2,749
170% 2,749 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 107%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 272
Parallax 201
187% 234 fps
MRender 195
Gravity 155
Splatting 138
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 154%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,453
Write 2,350
Mixed 1,762
487% 2,188 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 72
239% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,908
DQ Write 1,564
DQ Mixed 1,718
1,291% 1,730 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 28.8
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 28.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 8 240 24.5" 1280 720 LEN66F0 Y25-30
Typical GA-X670E AORUS PRO X Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 337%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 342%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670E AORUS PRO X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback