MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '24 at 18:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 163
2-Core 298
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 884
87% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,084
67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
166% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 228
Parallax 432
160% 286 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 158
Splatting 303
225% 273 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 166%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.19.B3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1883
Write 1904
Mixed 1,524
395% 1,770 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 44.1
156% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 647
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 169
189% 334 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 313%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
890GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 192
Mixed 82.4
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-32A160X 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 35.1
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.5
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 33.6
100% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 27" 1280 720 HKC2775 27E1QA
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $663
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $158Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback