Today's hottest deals

Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '24 at 20:18
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 146
55% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 309
36% 280 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.1% Very good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 113
Parallax 98.8
72% 100 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 98.2
80% 98.5 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 275GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 102
Mixed 102
SusWrite 91.1
72% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 2.8
472% 3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 43.4" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback