Micro UM480XT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro UM480XT  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F6BFC
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 19:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 74.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,014
96% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,293
80% 1,293 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 24.2
14% 19.6 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.5
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESO512GTLCW-EP3-2L 512GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1395 327 327 329 329 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,259
Write 1,660
Mixed 1,398
SusWrite 506
272% 1,206 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 55
178% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 992
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 804
598% 801 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 172%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 27.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 15.3" 1280 720 DZX1580 KYY
Typical UM480XT Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Micro UM480XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback