HP Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88C1
Memory244.9 GB free of 256 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240307
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '24 at 10:55
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w7-3465X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 921
82% 691 Pts
64-Core 3,651
226% 3,651 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
HP(103C 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.2% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 52
Parallax 48.6
36% 48.5 fps
MRender 52.9
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 46.7
38% 47.2 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BH7 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4TGXG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1277 1268 1262 1232 1243 1442 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1,152
Mixed 1220
SusWrite 1,288
284% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 41.1
140% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 212
234% 386 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 199%
Great: 500%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH7 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: HPS4TGXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2119 2824 2864 2872 2039 1721 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,436
Write 2,758
Mixed 2,592
SusWrite 2,406
576% 2,548 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 90.2
296% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 435
354% 505 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 361%
Great: 437%
Hgst HUS726T4TALE6L4 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: HPH0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 241 242 241 242 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 238
Write 231
Mixed 120
SusWrite 242
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 1.5
11% 4.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 4.2
DQ Mixed 6.5
4% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M321R8GA0PB0-CWMJJ Micron MTC40F2046S1RC56BD1 QLFF M321R8GA0PB0-CWMJJ M321R8GA0PB0-CWMJJ 127GB
5600, 5600, 5600, 5600 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
257% Outstanding
MC Read 128
MC Write 102
MC Mixed 97.7
312% 109 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 0P 5R 7G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 12% 49 194 14 60 24" 1920 1017 BNQ78A4 BenQ GL2450
History: Score 8: 0P 0R 1G 5B | Score 53: 0P 5R 7G 7B
Typical Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 184%
UFO

System: HP Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback