Today's hottest deals

HP 700-214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 700-214  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 18:21
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 173
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 316
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AF7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.6
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.5
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 155 136 118 118 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 398
Write 252
Mixed 292
SusWrite 132
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 1.1
46% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 35.8
40% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 20" 1280 720 DELD010 DELL E207WFP
Typical 700-214 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback