Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics198% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory44.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '24 at 02:49
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$163
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 157
2-Core 304
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,045
99% 819 Pts
64-Core 1333
82% 1333 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Zotac(19DA 3696) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
198% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 264
Parallax 292
230% 280 fps
MRender 361
Gravity 241
Splatting 186
206% 263 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 198%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 256 242 180 139 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 444
Write 451
Mixed 426
SusWrite 232
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 36.3
129% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 366
275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 109%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
112GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1009 871 878 869 780 782 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2000
Write 1,364
Mixed 1,315
SusWrite 865
309% 1386 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 57.2
183% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,043
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 876
676% 926 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 232%
Great: 346%
Seagate ST4000VN006-3CW104 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 167 191 196 198 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 33
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 SPT6B3D Sceptre Y27
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $846
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback