Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 19:09
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$248
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 177
2-Core 346
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,321
119% 1,002 Pts
64-Core 2,187
135% 2,187 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$792
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4775 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 272
Reflection 254
Parallax 286
222% 271 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 232
Splatting 172
188% 239 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 189%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M480 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,035
Write 78
Mixed 153
572% 2,755 MB/s
4K Read 831
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 9
1,273% 281 MB/s
Poor: 240% Great: 578%
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148
447GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,286
Write 20.5
Mixed 42.8
784% 3,783 MB/s
4K Read 859
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.3
1,307% 288 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 113%
Intenso SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W0802A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,006
Write 20.9
Mixed 42.2
764% 3,690 MB/s
4K Read 862
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3.3
1,312% 289 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 272%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
699GB free
Firmware: AX001A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,381
Write 15.2
Mixed 32.4
2,484% 3,476 MB/s
4K Read 864
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3.4
36,412% 290 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
414GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 12,063
Mixed 14
4,314% 6,039 MB/s
4K Read 876
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
36,587% 292 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 47%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
56GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.3
Write 25.9
Mixed 28.6
37% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.4
240% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 45.2
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 32.5
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 43.1
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 167 27.6" 1280 720 ACR0804 ED270R P
Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback