Asus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics180% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240204
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:02
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 80.1
1-Core 186
2-Core 354
109% 207 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1,071
109% 881 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$520
Zotac(19DA 2714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
180% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 262
Parallax 267
225% 268 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 181
Splatting 140
148% 188 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 180%
Great: 205%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1679 1773 1928 1927 1917 2020 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,798
Write 2,102
Mixed 1,484
SusWrite 1874
410% 1,815 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 39.2
183% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 1,396
DQ Mixed 730
701% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 297%
Great: 394%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
510GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 459 461 468 419 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 460
Mixed 401
SusWrite 456
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 44
150% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 365
275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 110%
Great: 121%
External USB3.0 DISK00 10TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.9 4.7 2.5 1.3 2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 112
Write 196
Mixed 119
SusWrite 3.8
147% 108 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 1.2
270% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 89%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 5.6 5.2 2.3 1.3 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 72.5
Write 120
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 3.9
100% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 9 6.5 5.4 5.9 5.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK03 500GB
324GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 110 101 88 97 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 121
Write 56.9
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 95.8
106% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1TB
196GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 65 63 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 88.8
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 64.4
103% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
79% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL38-44-44 D5-5600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 58.7
MC Write 62.1
MC Mixed 59.8
172% 60.2 GB/s
SC Read 51.3
SC Write 58.3
SC Mixed 54.1
156% 54.6 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 165%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 165 34" 3440 1369 LHCFFFF XQ340 PRO
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $879
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback