Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E PG Lightning

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock X670E PG Lightning  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E PG Lightning
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 01:52
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$274
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 213
2-Core 404
120% 232 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,371
133% 1,091 Pts
64-Core 1,909
118% 1,909 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon PRO W6800
AMD(1002 0E1E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 32GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 183
Parallax 366
148% 244 fps
MRender 325
Gravity 137
Splatting 216
182% 226 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 148%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$145
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,187
Write 4,870
Mixed 3,636
809% 3,564 MB/s
4K Read 82.7
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 123
406% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 1,976
DQ Write 1,593
DQ Mixed 1,790
1,339% 1,786 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
WD WD80EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 206 208 206 207 209 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
162% Outstanding
MC Read 58.9
MC Write 56
MC Mixed 58.3
165% 57.7 GB/s
SC Read 54
SC Write 67
SC Mixed 55.2
168% 58.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 137%
This bench: 162%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 34" 1280 720 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical X670E PG Lightning Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E PG Lightning

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback