Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 23:44
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 170
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 276
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5186
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480V6D10H-1TB 1TB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.6.48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 386 341 404 343 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 853
Write 395
Mixed 436
SusWrite 366
114% 513 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 37.2
170% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 213
245% 429 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 131%
Great: 370%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 60 24" 1280 720 ACR0472 Acer XF240H
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback