User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 06:33
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 185
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 724
63% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.Q1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.3% Below average
Lighting 43
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 73.8
35% 56.3 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 38.6
39% 48.5 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 SSD 512GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0411A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 258 32 84 390 237 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 443
Write 382
Mixed 382
SusWrite 235
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 21.1
89% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 43.8
93% 185 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 37.8
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC212 PHL 241V8
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback