Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics170% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 22:49
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 175
2-Core 344
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 1,029
103% 836 Pts
64-Core 1,441
89% 1,441 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
170% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 237
Parallax 408
162% 282 fps
MRender 384
Gravity 164
Splatting 318
237% 288 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 170%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
928GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 426
Mixed 408
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 50.6
167% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 186
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
432GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,165
Write 3,680
Mixed 2255
608% 2,700 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 90.3
304% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,532
DQ Write 1,251
DQ Mixed 1,361
1,027% 1,381 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 355
Write 124
Mixed 185
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 34.1
128% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 93.7
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 104
80% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
922GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 190
Write 151
Mixed 81.9
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 35.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.6
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 31.5" 2560 1369 GSM772A LG QHD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $954
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback