Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook S13 X330UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook S13 X330UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X330UA
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 04:40
Run Duration503 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19% Very poor
Memory 27.2
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 42.5
19% 30.6 Pts
4-Core 60.5
8-Core 74.7
9% 67.6 Pts
64-Core 72.5
4% 72.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 19%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 13A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 3.6
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 5
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 217 173 177 177 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 312
Mixed 252
SusWrite 183
58% 249 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 134
74% 185 MB/s
4K Write 16.5
26% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E8E324EB-EGCG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 33 60 13.2" 1280 720 CMN1375
Typical VivoBook S13 X330UA Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S13 X330UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback