Today's hottest deals

Dell Studio 1749

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio 1749  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KVMW2
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '24 at 05:22
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 45.9
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 115
42% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 140
19% 142 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M
Dell(1028 041B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 4.2
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 231
Write 212
Mixed 192
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 19.3
67% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 94.2
94% 151 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Toshiba MK5056GSY 500GB-$106
440GB free
Firmware: LH003D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.2
Write 67
Mixed 23.5
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
Generic SL16G SD Card 16GB
11GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19
Write 9.5
Mixed 12.7
10% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.8
422% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3020EC58E9F1333 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 48 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR046F R240HY
Typical Studio 1749 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1749

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback