Today's hottest deals

Samsung 700A4L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 700A4L  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG DM700A4L-L34M
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 03 '24 at 17:04
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 164
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 448
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C14D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 6.2
4% 6.43 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV3-8D128 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T872003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 339
Write 188
Mixed 122
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 31.7
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 96.4
126% 230 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
448GB free
Firmware: AX005F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 113
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGSA80-32N220A 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 19.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 SPC2416 SEC-700A4LI
Typical 700A4L Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700A4L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback