| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160316 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 03 '24 at 16:52 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.3%
Good
|
71% 122 Pts
|
41% 311 Pts
|
23% 367 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58.8%
Above average
|
43% 98.9 fps
|
89% 108 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 139 155 127 83 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
77% 106 MB/s
|
129% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.1%
Below average
|
34% 11.8 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
50% 79.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 68 | 56 | 60 | 24" | 1920 1017 | ACI24A5 VG248 |
Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,518 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 616x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 486x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $62Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 482x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 587x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 421x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 244x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 108% - Outstanding | Total price: $392 |