Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V LE  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 18:20
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 82.4
48% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 386
36% 302 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.7
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4U 2TB
752GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09139
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 214 147 113 83 75 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 961
Write 1,730
Mixed 782
SusWrite 174
206% 912 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 51.2
135% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 234
220% 348 MB/s
Poor: 226%
This bench: 111%
Great: 383%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 44 40 38 46 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 157
Write 65.4
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 42.1
19% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 14.3
51% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 17
13% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
35GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 72 72 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 66.9
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 69.5
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
67GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 40 39 46 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 75.6
Write 89.9
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 42.5
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 8634 SUPERTALENT02 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 9.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 29 60 21.5" 1280 720 WAC1031 Cintiq 22HD
Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 1,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback