Pcspecialist Quantum Ultra

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics295% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive374% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPcspecialist Quantum Ultra  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z790-P
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 01:50
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KS-$579
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 80.9
81% 80.9 Pts
Poor: 123% Great: 138%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$960
Zotac(19DA 1702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5700 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
295% Outstanding
Lighting 444
Reflection 432
Parallax 458
362% 445 fps
MRender 547
Gravity 369
Splatting 266
308% 394 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 295%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$289
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3259 1591 1599 1551 1555 1577 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
374% Outstanding
Read 1,687
Write 4,075
Mixed 3,028
SusWrite 1,855
607% 2,661 MB/s
4K Read 72.2
4K Write 251
4K Mixed 124
402% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 1,702
DQ Write 1,358
DQ Mixed 1,524
1,142% 1,528 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 374%
Great: 619%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$105
255GB free
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4488 2028 1562 1550 1711 1621 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
460% Outstanding
Read 2,905
Write 4,332
Mixed 3,224
SusWrite 2,160
714% 3,155 MB/s
4K Read 78.1
4K Write 296
4K Mixed 130
442% 168 MB/s
DQ Read 1,882
DQ Write 1,486
DQ Mixed 1,660
1,249% 1,676 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 460%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK5X32G2A48C40A2 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 64.9
MC Write 65.8
MC Mixed 62.1
184% 64.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 52.3
SC Mixed 32.7
101% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 144%
This bench: 165%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 27" 1280 720 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical Quantum Ultra Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

System: Pcspecialist Quantum Ultra

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $2,121
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback