Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190515
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateMay 01 '24 at 12:32
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 791
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 161
Parallax 153
142% 163 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 132
Splatting 113
111% 139 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
163GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 458 410 367 241 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,428
Write 1,722
Mixed 1,517
SusWrite 348
282% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 54.7
176% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 517
DQ Mixed 664
501% 680 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 164%
Great: 365%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 42 42 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
810GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 102 101 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 139
Write 152
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 99.6
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 90%
BUFFALO HD-LXU3 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 01f7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 32 32 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 27.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 33.2
48% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
79% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 144 34" 1280 720 AOCB316 U34G3XM
Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback