Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateApr 29 '24 at 14:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$285
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 978
91% 759 Pts
64-Core 974
60% 974 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
MSI(1462 375C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.52
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.6% Good
Lighting 85.7
Reflection 113
Parallax 78.9
70% 92.4 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 81.6
Splatting 72.3
66% 82.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 17 31 8.2 26 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
472GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 130 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 170
Mixed 112
SusWrite 131
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-32A160X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.9% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 20.4
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 215 58 165 24" 1280 720 SPT0AB8 Sceptre M27
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback