Acer Aspire TC-886

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-886  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-886
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '24 at 15:06
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 466
63% 471 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 50
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 71.5
41% 59.8 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 42
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 69 54 59 57 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 126
Write 92.4
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 63.4
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FJ 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 8 60 21.7" 1280 720 HWP3294 HP 22vx
Typical Aspire TC-886 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Aspire TC-886

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback