Today's hottest deals

Besstar UM700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemBesstar UM700  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM700
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211104
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 23:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 25.2
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 126
39% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 178
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 12.1
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 8.2
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-A01 512GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 68 173 185 75 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 788
Write 266
Mixed 314
SusWrite 134
82% 376 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 25.1
90% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 266
194% 257 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S8K1C-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.4% Average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 0P 5R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 15% 102 102 54 60 23" 1280 720 DELB123 INSPIRON ONE
Typical UM700 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback