Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H57D-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '24 at 02:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3480
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 347
37% 295 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 46.4
43% 50.9 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 47.2
Splatting 43.4
36% 43.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 26 19 25 26 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.8% Poor
Read 193
Write 123
Mixed 127
SusWrite 28.4
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 15.8
63% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.3
DQ Write 31.2
DQ Mixed 21.5
17% 24 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 98%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
21GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 64 65 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 106
Write 33.2
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 64.2
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
263GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 64 64 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 27.6
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 64.3
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
94GB free
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 27 19 25 26 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 48.2
Mixed 34.6
SusWrite 29.5
29% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 54.6" 1280 720 XXX2841 Union TV
Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $311
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback