Today's hottest deals

Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemEmaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe  (all builds)
MotherboardEMAXX EMX-A70FM2+iCafe
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 870K
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 52
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 131
48% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056R6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 362
Write 302
Mixed 236
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 34
117% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 44.4
37% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
293GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 128 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 126
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$19
112GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 65 65 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 92.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 64.5
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX318C10FK2/16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 16.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 11
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 0" 1280 720
Typical EMX-A70FM2+iCafe Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Emaxx EMX-A70FM2+iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $29
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback