Acer Aspire A315-58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-58  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Camellia_TL
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 13:33
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 262
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 594
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 25
Parallax 24.6
15% 22.7 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 17.6
17% 21 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-1T00-1014 1TB
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,998
Write 1,586
Mixed 1,451
373% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 64.1
229% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 486
298% 318 MB/s
Poor: 236% Great: 574%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 16.2
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE07CB
Typical Aspire A315-58 Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback