Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate B113

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate B113  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA10_HX
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130322
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 23 '24 at 13:20
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1017U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 49.6
1-Core 37
2-Core 75.7
34% 54.1 Pts
4-Core 77.2
8-Core 78.2
10% 77.7 Pts
64-Core 76.5
5% 76.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0748) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 82 46 51 46 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.5% Poor
Read 187
Write 193
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 73.3
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 7.2
36% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 86.8
78% 118 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6BFR8A-PB HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 13 60 11.6" 1280 720 CMN1118
Typical TravelMate B113 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate B113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback