ECS H410H6-M7 V1.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardECS H410H6-M7 V1.1  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 13:53
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$210
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 676
62% 517 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.82
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 109 81 66 116 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 86.9
Write 76.5
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 89.7
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C16FF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 18.5" 1280 720 DELD03A DELL E1914H
Typical H410H6-M7 V1.1 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H410H6-M7 V1.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback