Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 160%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory43.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 21 '24 at 02:56
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 200
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 796
70% 597 Pts
64-Core 3,132
194% 3,132 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$520
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 206
Parallax 197
184% 209 fps
MRender 246
Gravity 151
Splatting 125
136% 174 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 154%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300B 512GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 354 344 335 332 338 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 147
Write 201
Mixed 164
SusWrite 330
48% 210 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 33.5
80% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 151
128% 187 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 96%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
97GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 309 302 300 297 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 459
Mixed 445
SusWrite 323
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 62.7
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 129%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$74
327GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 117 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 117
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 87%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$74
493GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 136 138 135 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 137
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-UH 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 41.4
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 120%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 14% 44 195 14 60 27.9" 1280 720 AOC2879 U2879G6
Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback