Asrock X399M Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X399M Taichi  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 16 '24 at 20:55
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 76.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 194
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 867
79% 661 Pts
64-Core 2,075
128% 2,075 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1236 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.3% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 65
34% 54.8 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 42.3
41% 50.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1.5TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2560 2235 2297 2375 2402 2466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2462
Write 3,390
Mixed 1,846
SusWrite 2,389
570% 2,522 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 56.9
179% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 664
486% 632 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 328%
Great: 647%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.6
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 35" 1280 720 SPT0DB7 Sceptre C35
Typical X399M Taichi Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399M Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $764
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback