Today's hottest deals

HP xw6600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP xw6600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A9Ch
Memory19.5 GB free of 24.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateApr 15 '24 at 08:06
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5430
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 36.9
2-Core 82.1
38% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 334
29% 250 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
AMD(1002 2304) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 22.7
12% 18.6 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vi550 S3 SSD 512GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 165 238 151 131 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 185
Write 101
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 183
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 10.9
48% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.5
DQ Mixed 109
56% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 115%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
145GB free
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 72 76 74 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 53.4
Mixed 35.1
SusWrite 74
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 51%
WD RE4 250GB (2010)-$34
61GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 73 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 79
Write 73.8
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 70.7
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 57GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 7.8
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 HPN3474 HP E273q
Typical xw6600 Workstation Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback