Today's hottest deals

Google Auron_Paine

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Auron_Paine  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Auron_Paine
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 14 '24 at 03:42
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3205U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Memory 15.4
1-Core 22.6
2-Core 39.3
15% 25.8 Pts
4-Core 50.8
8-Core 57.9
7% 54.3 Pts
64-Core 53.9
3% 53.9 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 1606) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTS430S 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 22Z4W14J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 227 281 273 211 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 305
Write 270
Mixed 270
SusWrite 235
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 17.4
54% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 97.4
78% 108 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 4.2
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 413
10% 413 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 26 60 11.6" 1280 720 CMN1132
Typical Auron_Paine Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Google Auron_Paine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback