Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150820
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '24 at 21:13
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 356
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3607 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 121
Parallax 137
108% 130 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 129
Splatting 111
112% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 120GB-$80
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 346
Mixed 147
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 32.4
110% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 30.3
105% 230 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 104%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
76GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 334 408 422 428 441 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 444
Mixed 420
SusWrite 399
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 42.8
144% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 293
240% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 95 95 93 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68% Good
Read 140
Write 136
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 96.4
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
199GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 107 109 106 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 124
Write 130
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 107
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 13 144 24" 1280 720 AUS24B1 ROG PG248Q
Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $243
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback