Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '24 at 19:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel CoreT i5-1340P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 66
1-Core 185
2-Core 361
105% 204 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 895
97% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5382
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.97 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
512gb NVME EVM 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 152 152 139 159 157 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 210
Write 150
Mixed 149
SusWrite 149
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 7.1
50% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 84.1
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 75.8
63% 90 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD5S480016G-B 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 14
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 32" 1280 720 XGM8030 XGIMI TV
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback