Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory47.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 119
53% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 372
36% 297 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 2011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 94.5
Reflection 99.1
Parallax 100
77% 97.9 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 94
Splatting 86.6
85% 107 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 90%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 713 293 286 262 237 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 727
Mixed 1,024
SusWrite 337
177% 792 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 39.4
126% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 391
295% 402 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 121%
Great: 296%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
87GB free, PID a307
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 126 127 126 126 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 125
135% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF4G64HZ-3G2F1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 34 144 54.6" 1280 720 SAM7106 SAMSUNG
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback